Can photography describe a dream? Can photography speak of human thinking? Can photography build a work of fiction? Absolutely not. Photography cannot and never reflects the intangible art forms. While many other arts are possible: such as literature, music, dance, cinema, etc. But photography has the strength that no other art has: it is a capture of reality so quickly and accurately that no other art has. Therefore, without concrete reality, there is no photography.
When I held the camera up to shoot, no photographer thought: I will shoot. I am shooting in the form of socialist realism or the romantic or surreal method, etc. The biggest concern of the person holding the camera is how to shoot, how the angle, how the light, how the moment and characters, themes, static, dynamic. The most important thing for the person holding the camera is: How to shoot. Also this distinguishes the level and talent of those who hold the machine. So, how to capture the audience stunned, surprised and admired the talent of the photographer.
New and strange elements are one of the characteristics and creativity of photography. New and strange on the background of reality and the constant movement of life. To accomplish this is not simple. New is to look out, discover, create. The strange thing is presenting and interpreting new things in their own way, not duplicates, unlike those already available. In fact, strangeness has included a new one. Of course, newness and novelty do not mean photography exploits differences, dark moments, oppositions to the human mind and soul.
Many opinions among photographers, in the world of art activities also suggest that many of our photographers lack a certain cultural level. Therefore, many of our images are only reflected, reproducing the beauty inherent in life without a depth of thought, a generalization or an in depth problem of real life. Photographers do not cultivate their own knowledge and do not enrich their souls, it is very difficult to have works of intellectual depth.